Racism Lucy Gaffney and Ireland PLC.
June 11, 2007
Put the words racism and Ireland into your browser and you will be presented with one and a half millions links. That’s a lot of information about racism and Ireland. And if you spend a few hours as I do on a regular basis you will soon discover that racism can mean just about anything you want it to. In spite of this the number of people who manage to make a very good living out of the perceived issue of racism is quite extraordinary. The list is almost endless so let us just look at one such person.
Lucy Gaffney is a very successful woman. She is among other things Chairperson of NPAR ( National Action Plan against Racism) which was launched by the government in 2005. It’s aim , it claims , is to provide strategic direction to develop a more inclusive , intercultural society in Ireland. But Gaffney did not arrive at this position out of the blue. As I said she is a successful woman.
In 1983 she was appointed Chairperson of Servcast , a provider of on-line multi-media solutions. She also took on the position of non executive director with the company. She is chairperson of the radio station 98FM and is non executive director of another station Spin FM. She is also a non executive director of the Denis O’Brien company Digital Carribean Limited. But before you jump to the conclusion that she must be a very intelligent person just remember that we’ve seen people just like this on The Apprentice showing themselves to be little more than fools. But regardless of your view on that I think you will all agree with me that this woman is not on the minimum wage. Which is to say no one is helping to keep her wages down.
In 2005 at an Anti Racist Woorkshop Week meeting she said , “I believe that the corporate community has a critical role to play in ensuring that Ireland is well positioned to take advantage of the talent and skills the new workers in Ireland are bringing to the economy”. And this is of course what the whole issue is in fact all about. It comes from Europe and stems from the idea’s of the free movement of labour ( a euphemism for cheap labour) and all that that implies.
Gaffney is the new face of Ireland. And you don’t have to look very far to see what that Ireland stands for. If we consider that the right to have a roof over your head is one of the most fundamental rights a person can have then it begs the question as to why no one in Ireland actually has that right. It’s unlikely that you will be able to keep any job if your without a home to live in and yet this basic right is ignored in Ireland. There is also the fact that the Gaffney’s of this world would not do their jobs for the minimum wage. That fact that thousands are brought in to Ireland to do just that does not make it moral or right. And the fact that those at the bottom of the economic ladder may be prepared to work for such a wage does not alter the fact that it is exploitation. Like many of her type Gaffney is well insulated against the negative affects of the huge level of immigration we have in Ireland and not only that but is being paid very well to promote something that can only further these problems. The corporate sector that she feels at home with has a very real interest in seeing that this situation continues.
The name of Adolf Hitler is often invoked in debates over immigration so let me remind all that Hitler believed that it was vital to win over the corporate sector of society if he was to succeed and history has shown that in this he was knocking on an open door. In Ireland the self same corporate state is quite happy to claim that it is motivated by the highest of ideals while at the same time robbing the poorest countries of their nurses and doctors.
As our mothers used to say , “Show me your company and I’ll tell you what you are”.
June 13, 2007 at 1:53 am
The corporate world like any other entity works hand in glove with one another. Their aim is to exploit those who are less well off. Lucy Gaffney and her colleagues don’t know the meaning of the word ‘morality’. Consequently they are all the poorer for this.
June 16, 2007 at 9:30 pm
[...] decent wage there would be no shortage of Irish people willing and ready to do just about any job. Lucy Gaffney (NPAR) and people like her , champions of mass immigration who at the same time are raking in profits from [...]
June 24, 2007 at 7:33 pm
[...] of you. The church , the side entrance with the door that opens on to the dinner room….. Lucy Gaffney , The Merchants Quay Project/NPAR/blah blah blah/Stanislaus Kennedy. Sharing the same committees , [...]
February 18, 2009 at 5:32 am
I had the following ‘discussion’ with Captain Purplehead:
“Irish Savant’s comments regarding intelligence and it’s importance in terms of immigration are supported by academic literature. Intelligence, like all behavioural traits, is significantly hereditary. It significantly predicts academic performance, and occupational success in more complex jobs (this is why the US army still uses the tests). As the economy becomes more complex therefore it is vital to have a well educated and highly intelligent population.
Also, it is quite clear that their are group differences in averages. Further, gene variants associated with higher intelligence gene variants (rs2760118-C on SSADH, rs324650-T on CHRM2, and rs760761-C on DTNBP1, for example) are not distributed evenly among the populations sampled in the Hapmap.
G. Cochran, J. Hardy, H. Harpending, Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence, Journal of Biosocial Science 38 (5), pp. 659–693 (2006).
“Data from more than 8000 parent-offspring pairs, 25,000 sibling pairs, 10,000 twin pairs and adoption studies provide evidence that genetic factors play a substantial role in the variation of general intelligence, with heritability estimates ranging from 40 to 80%” –Burdick et al, Cognitive variation in DTNBP1 influence general cognitive ability. Human Molecular Genetics, 2006, Vol 15, No. 10.
“Heritability estimtes for intelligence quotient (IQ) range from 0.50 to 0.80. This makes IQ a suitable target for attempts to identify the specific genes involved.” Chorney et al, Role of the cholinergic muscarinic 2 receptor (CHRM@) gene in cognition. Molecular Psychiatry (2003) 8. 10-13.
“A substantial body of literature from twin, family and adoption studies documents significant genetic effects on human intelligence. Heritability estimates range from 40 to 80% and meta-analyses suggest an overall heritability of around 50%” Dick et al, (2006) “Association of CHRM2 with IQ: Converging Evidence for Genes Influencing Intelligence.” Behavioral Genetics.
“Multivariate genetic analyses indicate that general intelligence is highly heritable, and that the overlap in the cognitive processes is twice as great as the overall phenotypic overlap, with genetic correlations averaging around .80.”
Plomin et al (2004) “A functional polymorphism in the succinate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase genes is associated with cognitive ability,” Molecular Psychology 9, 582-586.
Rushton, J. P., & Jensen, A. R. (2005). Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 235-294
http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf
Comment by Ben Richards — January 29, 2009 @ 8:51 pm
Also, it is good to have someone questioning the wisdom of mass immigration. Research doesn’t suggest it’s such a great idea.
For instance research on it by Robert Putman at Harvard shows that increased diversity leads to reduced trust and community engagement. Prof. Putnam cited other studies that have found people in “diverse” workgroups-not only of race but also age and professional background-are less loyal to the group, more likely to resign, and generally less satisfied than people who work with people like themselves. He also noted a study that found carpooling is less common in racially-mixed neighborhoods. Carpooling means counting on your neighbors, and people are more likely to trust people like themselves. Studies from Australia, Sweden, and Canada also show that ethnic diversity lowers levels of trust, and the same effect is found in non-Western countries.
Dora Costa of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Matthew Kahn of Tufts University analyzed 15 recent studies of the impact of diversity on social cohesion. They found that every study had “the same punch line: heterogeneity reduces civic engagement. In more diverse communities, people participate less as measured by how they allocate their time, their money, their voting and their willingness to take risks to help others.”
Even the economic benefits of mass immigration are questionable. The report last year in England by the Lords economic affairs said immigration had had “little or no positive impact” on the living standards of the existing population.
Comment by Ben Richards — January 29, 2009 @ 8:55 pm
You may think this is trivial, but the implications of differences in group ability are considerable. Eventually Ireland will require ‘affirmative action’ and diversity programmes. However, as the US experience shows these are hugely costly & lead to resentment.
http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/pdf/costofdiversity.pdf
Comment by Ben Richards — January 29, 2009 @ 8:59 pm
Yep! You’re an idiot alright. After three comments and an unbelievably long-winded response, you actually appear to be a bigger idiot that I first thought.
Comment by captainpurplehead — January 29, 2009 @ 9:09 pm
Yup. This is a gravely challenged individual.
Idiot.
Comment by Bock the Robber — January 29, 2009 @ 9:47 pm
He’s one of those unfortunate idiots though. You know the ones. They come up with a whole doctrine to excuse their idiocy but just come up looking like more of an idiot that they originally did. What a fucking idiot..
Comment by captainpurplehead — January 29, 2009 @ 9:55 pm
CaptainPurple Head,
Do you actually disagree with anything I’ve said in a factual sense? It seems you are committing the moralistic fallacy – it’s bad so therefore it cannot be true.
Seriously, can you explain why my post annoys you? And I mean what specifically you disagree with?
Comment by Ben Richards — January 30, 2009 @ 3:21 am
All I’m suggesting is that in 30 years you will realise that the experience in Canada and the UK is not unique. Some immigrant groups will be overrepresented in violent crime and academic underachievement. Others (namely East Asian of Chinese or Japanese descent) will excel academically and be underrepresented in crime.
However, as a result of one group underperforming various diversity and affirmative action measures will be undertaken and you will be blamed for institutional racism in causing their underachievement.
Just giving you a heads up.
Rushton, J.P., & Whitney, G. (2002). Cross-national variation in violent crime rates: Race, r-K theory, and income. Population and Environment, 23, 501-511.
Comment by Ben Richards — January 30, 2009 @ 3:38 am
You seem to have a plethora of quotes to bang away with but no historical substance to your argument. If anything, our race has shown that we’re easily led and quite happy to go with the flow – even if that flow happens to be a flow directed by bigotted dickheads like yourself and, say, Hitler. By the way, if you think that I’m bringing this down to level of hurling insults at you it is because I am. I find you and your fascist buddies to be the most detestable fucking knuckle-dragging morons that happened to spew forth into the midwife’s hands.
Comment by captainpurplehead — January 30, 2009 @ 9:21 am
Oh and another thing; you’re an idiot! History is littered with idiots who thought they knew more than everyone else about race. The only difference with you is that you appear infinitely more vacuous than the rest.
Comment by captainpurplehead — January 30, 2009 @ 4:29 pm
CaptainPurple Head,
I should probably mention to you ‘Godwin’s Law’ in case you haven’t heard of it previously.
If you were serious about history you’d realise that your view that their are no group differences, or that people are essentially blank slates has had equally dire consequences. For instance, the Chinese in Malaysia or Armenian Jews have been persecuted for their overachievement. Of course this overlooks research, such as I’ve cited above, that East Asians and Ashkenazi Jews have a higher group average on intelligence tests. Therefore there occupational and academic success is entirely predictable. By not realising group differences it makes people believe differences must be due to unfairness. This leads to resentment & in some cases persecution as those examples show (also consider Pol Pot’s ‘Year Zero’).
Also, you must realise that group differences do not imply much about a particular individual (for instance you’ll have overlap amongst groups) so I’m not suggesting you prejudge individuals based on race.
Comment by Ben Richards — February 1, 2009 @ 11:23 pm
“bigotted dickheads like yourself and, say, Hitler”
You forgot Gandhi & Albert Schweitzer (see their comments on living in Africa).
Seriously, mentioning Hitler is silly. A couple of points.
1. Nazis were killing people & trying to create an empire – I’m just suggesting you should observe overseas experience in immigration decisions.
2. I’m suggesting IQ is surprisingly effective in predicting a number of outcomes. The Nazis banned IQ tests because Jews outperformed the general population.
Comment by Ben — February 2, 2009 @ 7:18 am
Yeah but you’re still an idiot.
Comment by Cap\’n P — February 3, 2009 @ 6:36 pm
“Yeah but you’re still an idiot.”
Dude, give up. You can’t defend your position.
Comment by Ben — February 5, 2009 @ 10:33 pm
Y’see, Ben, this is the problem with idiots like you. You state your opinion as fact. The fact actually is that you have researched articles that support your idiotic theories – not to mention ideals and you satisfy yourself with the fact that your ignorant rhetoric can be justified because it is in print somewhere else. You seem to be the kind of idiot who has spent your whole life cossetted in the emerald isle in your mother’s house. My opinion of you is that you’re an idiot and I think I’ve defended that really well. By the way, don’t call me dude. You claim to be Irish so stop talking like a fucking American. Y’see there’s another reason why you’re an idiot. If you were really confident in your position, you wouldn’t have even commented on this post but you know deep down that you’re an idiot. You say I can’t defend my position but why should I even bother when you’re doing such a fine job of defending my position every time you leave a comment. There isn’t one sane person out there who agrees with your position. Look, maybe you should just leave your mother’s house and crawl into the same cave as the rest of the idiots like you.
Comment by captainpurplehead — February 6, 2009 @ 8:38 am
Oh, by the way, I’m very familliar with Godwin’s law – having alluded to it in a couple of previous posts. The problem with Godwin’s law is that it has become the primary defence of every facist idiot to whom it has been related.
Comment by captainpurplehead — February 6, 2009 @ 8:49 am
“There isn’t one sane person out there who agrees with your position.”
Again, you resort to name calling rather than making an argument. Essentially the first refuge of the incompetent (well, technically it’s violence but name calling is close behind).
I’ll tell you what, if in 30 years African migrants to Ireland aren’t overrepresented in crime, welfare dependency & underperforming academically, then I’ll pay you $100. I only say this because I bother to look at evidence from overseas & also the psychometric research cited above. I’m not sure what you rely on.
Comment by Ben — February 6, 2009 @ 12:02 pm
I haven’t called you any names. I’ve simply described you accurately. You’re a racist and no amount of tub thumping and quoting every study that supports your theory is going to change that. As I’ve said, with every comment you make, you simply prove my argument. To any reasonable and educated person out there, you’re wrong. It’s as simple as that. You’re Irish and you think that African immigrants are our problem? Look around you, idiot! The Irish are killing themselves. As for your wager; again, I live in the EU so dollars are of little use. Why don’t you do us all a favour and move over to the deep south with the rest of your kind.
Comment by captainpurplehead — February 6, 2009 @ 12:13 pm
“To any reasonable and educated person out there, you’re wrong.”
You keep asserting this, but don’t demonstrate why. Perhaps, like the Emperor’s New Clothes, it’s something that just must be accepted.
Personally, I consider the Japanese to be very educated & reasonable. They don’t appear to be rushing forth to allow mass immigration. Quite the opposite, Japan is 98% japanese. Also, as former Singaporian leader Lee Kuan Yew pointed out, having a multicultural country is problematic in democracies as the vote tends to be a racial head count.
Comment by Ben — February 6, 2009 @ 10:45 pm
“As for your wager; again, I live in the EU so dollars are of little use.”
Ok, I’ll pay Euros or whatever currency you nominate at the time.
Comment by Ben — February 6, 2009 @ 10:52 pm
You really are insecure aren’t you.
Comment by Cap\’n P — February 7, 2009 @ 1:27 pm
I must say that “Ben” has won this “debate” easily. He has all the facts and empirical evidence on his side, the other side just resort to name calling and wishful thinking.
Comment by martin_uk — February 7, 2009 @ 11:37 pm
Captain P,
This is an example of the kind of problem having groups with differing average abilities leads too:
“Seven black firefighters are suing the city, contending that the Houston Fire Department’s test for officer promotions adversely affects blacks.
“This is systemic discrimination,” said the firefighters’ attorney, Dennis Thompson. “Selection rates for African-Americans are abysmally smaller than for white candidates.”
What the article doesn’t mention is that gentile whites would also score below Ashkenazi Jews or East Asians on psychometric tests, but this is never due to systematic discrimination. The reality is that groups tend to have different abilities on average, so achieving proportional results is impossible. However, people will blame it on racism and bring these ridiculous lawsuits.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/6247438.html
Comment by Ben Richards — February 8, 2009 @ 3:27 am
Admit it, Captain Purplehead, Ben has won the argument hands down.
Comment by Dave M. — February 8, 2009 @ 6:44 am
Ah well now that Martin and Dave have declared a winner I suppose it must be fact. Listen Ben; just because you’ve got a couple of your racist buddies to lend a hand means fuck all. You’re a racist. If you want one example, take a look at the new American president and compare him to the old white clown that he succeeded. You, Martin and Dave are morons. That’s not name calling; it’s just a simple fact. It’s not your fault that you’re morons but that doesn’t alter the fact that you are. Grow up and grow a brain. You sit at a pc spouting racist bullshit when your time would be better served doing something decent.
Comment by Cap’n P — February 8, 2009 @ 5:41 pm
Cap’n P — This creature has an obsession with black people. I don’t know why you entertain it.
You realise, Cap’n, that it gets its jollies from this kind of argument and that it’s typing these comments with one hand.
Comment by Bock the Robber — February 8, 2009 @ 6:20 pm
I think Ben’s position is far more persuasive, Cap’n. He has research to back up his position, so far you have just called him names. Indeed, name calling is the last recourse for an exhausted mind.
Comment by Martel — February 8, 2009 @ 7:25 pm
“If you want one example, take a look at the new American president and compare him to the old white clown that he succeeded.”
Captain P, read my posts above again. They refer to group averages. There is overlap amongst the groups. For instance there are gentile whites who outperform Ashkenazi Jews academically. This doesn’t alter the fact that the group averages are different.
Comment by Ben Richards — February 8, 2009 @ 8:36 pm
An exhausted mind? Hhmmm, you could have something there, “Martel”. My mind does become exhausted from too mush exposure to people like “you”, “Dave” and “Martin” but I haven’t resorted to name calling, I’m merely describing you all quite accurately. “All” of “you” keep alluding to the fact that he has researched his racist theories but taking a couple of random suggestions simply because they support your idiotic argument isn’t research.
Comment by Cap\’n P — February 8, 2009 @ 8:46 pm
“All” of “you” keep alluding to the fact that he has researched his racist theories but taking a couple of random suggestions simply because they support your idiotic argument isn’t research.”
Captain P, what do you disagree with?
human intelligence:
* can be measured;
* matters, a lot;
* differs by heredity (50% to 80%);
* (most controversially) differs, on average, among various groups, such as races.
Here is an explanation that may help you in relation to how it is distributed.
Seligman does not argue that this means any white you stop in the street will be necessarily smarter than any black. Group averages tell nothing about individuals. Blacks score at all ability levels, including the very highest. Individual black scores as high as 200 have been recorded. There are about 5 million American blacks who score above the white average.
And for those who still believe in white supremacy, Seligman has bad news: On average whites score lower in IQ tests than East Asians.
So why drag all this into the open at a time when reasonable people want better race relations? Seligman’s answer: Since IQ is a good measure of potential job performance, it cannot be ignored in hiring and promotion, as affirmative action quota policies dictate. He suggests that, in attempting to ensure equal representation at every level, public policy may be on a collision course with reality.
Intelligence in a population, Seligman points out, is distributed in a “normal” or bell-shaped curve around the average, or median, score. The further from the median, the more dramatically the number of individuals in that range shrinks.
Thus an IQ level of 115 is considered the threshold for top managerial and professional jobs. Only about 16% of whites, or about 30 million, score at or above it. There are many individual blacks in that range. But their proportion of the total black population is smaller, because the 115 threshold is further from the black median IQ.
Seligman cites University of Delaware sociologist Linda Gottfredson’s work: “It suggests that the distribution of income and occupations may already be about what the IQ numbers would predict.”
“The black-white IQ gap is only one chapter out of 15 in the book,” Seligman says. But, he adds resignedly, “It’s what people really want to talk about.”
Comment by Ben Richards — February 8, 2009 @ 10:13 pm
If you’re still asking what I disagree with, you’re a bigger idiot than even I took you for – and I think you’re an idiot of gargantuan proportions. You can take control groups or you can manipulate them to get favourable results based on your particular ethos. You’re a racist and I hate racism.
Comment by captainpurplehead — February 8, 2009 @ 11:10 pm
“If you’re still asking what I disagree with, you’re a bigger idiot than even I took you for – and I think you’re an idiot of gargantuan proportions. You can take control groups or you can manipulate them to get favourable results based on your particular ethos. You’re a racist and I hate racism.”
1. So people have manipulated results to show East Asians and Ashkenazi Jews outperform gentile whites on average? Hmmm…
2. If I pointed to research showing groups do better in different athletic pursuits would that be racist? If groups have some variance in physical traits because of evolving in different areas, why is pointing that out racist?
3. If it’s simply a case of manipulating the study, why not get some neutral group to fund some research?
You don’t like what a century of psychometricians have come up with? That’s fine: but what have you come up with? You don’t think I.Q. tests are valid as a way to quantify smartness? Then what do you think is valid? What methodology would you suggest? Where is your data? What hypotheses have you generated? Where did you publish your results? What do your results say about group differences?
In science you have to walk the walk. I.Q. deniers are like the Intelligent Design folk: long on critique, pitifully short on research, on data, on work, on science.
Comment by Ben Richards — February 9, 2009 @ 12:37 am
Cap’n, when you’re in a hole, the first thing to do is stop digging. Ben is all over you, let’s face it. Your mistake was to actually believe the Establishment bullshine about racial equality in every conceivable thing (to the hundredth decimal place). But do you think the Establishment elite actaully believe it themselves? I’ll tell you what, they always make sure that their own children attend all white schools!
Comment by martin_uk — February 9, 2009 @ 1:00 am
Martin; you’re a racist moron – that’s not calling you names, it’s just a statement of fact – and, as such, you will always think anyone who doesn’t think like you is wrong. It’s what makes you a moron.
Ben; Same goes for you.
Comment by captainpurplehead — February 9, 2009 @ 3:15 pm
Captain, I guess you are conceeding the points above. You don’t like them, but you accept they are probably correct. I understand.
Comment by Ben Richards — February 9, 2009 @ 7:24 pm
Ah so you’ve now resorted to schoolyard tactics, Ben. I was wondering how long it would take an utter moron like yourself to do that. You’re a racist. I disagree totally with you as a person and your complete set of ideals. Listen, maybe you should just get out more. Y’know, get yourself laid instead of tossing yourself off to pictures of Eva Braun.
Comment by captainpurplehead — February 9, 2009 @ 7:52 pm
Eva Braun! I love it.
Ben and his aliases remind me of the incredibly boring one-track character in the pub who won’t go away until you agree with them.
This individual seems to be disturbingly obsessed with black people.
Comment by Bock the Robber — February 9, 2009 @ 11:47 pm
“Y’know, get yourself laid instead of tossing yourself off to pictures of Eva Braun.”
Again, this shows that you haven’t been paying attention. The Nazis outlawed IQ tests because Jews scored above average on them.
“Ben and his aliases remind me of the incredibly boring one-track character in the pub who won’t go away until you agree with them.”
You really have 3 options. Agree. Disagree, or withold judgement. All Captain Purplehead has done is hurl abuse. That’s fine, but it isn’t persuasive.
Comment by Ben Richards — February 10, 2009 @ 1:28 am
“tossing yourself off”
Besides, I’m more of a Megan Fox fan.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_2gv6ieO34Fo/SK78wtyXIdI/AAAAAAAAD9Q/PiNkfyvdT7A/s400/Megan+Fox2.bmp
Comment by Ben Richards — February 10, 2009 @ 2:11 am
Re the captainpurplehead vs. Ben Richards: Capn, you have been utterly outclassed! Why is it, really, that “progressives” have such a hysterical time accepting the reality 1) of racial differentiation, and 2) that whites are just so much more pleasant on average to have as the majority of your society than other races, especially violent Africans, who bring vice and criminality in their wake literally wherever they go? I would really likt to understand the ricdiculous leftist mind, because you fucking wanker cowards ARE DESTROYING WESTERN CIVILIZATION FOR NO REASON BUT YOUR OWN STUPIDITY.
Comment by leon haller — February 10, 2009 @ 10:21 am
I haven’t hurled abuse, I’ve merely described what you are. You and your alias and the other trained monkeys you’ve got to assist you by stating you’ve won a debate which was never really a debate have proved my argument time and time again. Look at Leon. I mean he must be a card carrying nazi to make that comment. I’m frankly surprised he’s able to work the keyboard. He’s a good example of the kind of knuckle-dragging moron to whom you’ve allied yourself. You’re an idiot but I do feel genuine pity for you, Ben. Your world is pretty dumb and pretty dark. Leon, you’ve got some serious issues. I suggest immersing your head in water for about half an hour. If you find this difficult, maybe you could get a friend – if indeed you have any – to hold your head down for you.
Comment by Cap’n P — February 10, 2009 @ 12:25 pm
Captain, I’m still waiting to hear how Irish Savant is wrong about African immigration.
Comment by Ben — February 11, 2009 @ 9:15 am
Why can’t you recognize reality? Really, I want to know. Come visit the US. Every one of the twenty (or two hundred) most violent shitpile neighborhoods is black. You can’t possibly be such an asshole that you could be indifferent to the prospect of Africans invading lovely white Ireland?! Why allow that? THEY DO NOT BELONG THERE – anymore than whites belong in, say, Ghana. The difference is that wherever white men go, they improve territories; wherever blacks go they ruin them. One need not be a Nazi to recognize that. Indeed, I know at least 6 Jews who are in militant agreement with me. The larger point is that you “regressives” never offer any evidence for your endless, unexamined assertions about race. But I really would like to understand how people like you, who exist at such an incredible psychic remove from reality, come to be. How can any white today NOT be a racist? Anti-racism is obviously a form of psychosis, to which whites are disproportionately susceptible. I just want to understand your outlook (though ultimately, of course, I intend to annihilate it).
Comment by leon haller — February 11, 2009 @ 12:55 pm
Leon: For a white American to talk about another race invading a country they don’t belong in is frankly laughable.
Ben: There has been an increase in violent crime since the influx of other races but that has been between white Irish scumbags who have the IQ of a squashed beetle. You’re full of fucking shit.
Comment by captainpurplehead — February 11, 2009 @ 2:45 pm
Gotta love the Internet. In the old days, Captain Purplehead could’ve endured his humiliation in private. Now, children the world over get to point and laugh at him. Maybe he’ll become a cautionary tale for some village in China or Burkina Faso. Heh.
Comment by JohnP — February 12, 2009 @ 10:13 pm
Really, John? Do you really think that I’m going to be that famous? Wow! I’m coming over all unecessary. John, you’re another one of those American racist friends of Ben. Ben Richards is the most insecure twat who has ever read this blog. But look, John, don’t worry about me being humilliated. If it gets too much I can always delete these comments but why would I do that when all you little racists are adamant that you want to publish your stupidity on my site. Please keep it coming, you’re all hilarious little racists. Little Ben, Little Martel, little John and, of course, Leon the West Highland Terrier. A merry band of idiots. Endlessly entertaining.
Comment by captainpurplehead — February 13, 2009 @ 2:44 pm
“Little Ben, Little Martel, little John and, of course, Leon the West Highland Terrier. A merry band of idiots. Endlessly entertaining.”
Happy to entertain you Captain. Who knows, maybe as I indicated above, one day you might see Irish Savant had a point.
Comment by Ben — February 15, 2009 @ 8:17 am
Cap’n Dickhead would be more accurate given your childish response.
Comment by Harry — February 17, 2009 @ 1:35 pm
According to Leon, wherever white men go they improve territories.
I’d imagine the native Americans would have something to say about that.
Comment by Bock the Robber — February 18, 2009 @ 1:00 am
“According to Leon, wherever white men go they improve territories.
I’d imagine the native Americans would have something to say about that.
Comment by Bock the Robber — February 18, 2009 @ 1:00 am”
How does that address the argument made by Irish Savant? That increasing african migration will increase crime, state dependency, increase conflict (racial bias type lawsuits) and lower educational standards (affirmative action type quotas, ‘diversity’ schemes etc)?
Comment by Ben — February 18, 2009 @ 4:12 am
April 21, 2010 at 11:19 pm
did you see watch O’Reilly last night?