Comments on: Ian Brady : Moors Murders: Letter’s , Quotes and Comments.

By: Patrice

Patrice — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:23:52 +0000

sillyoldtwit.com, how do you do if?

http://videospursuit.blogspot.com/2010/03/sough-papoose.html

By: Weldon

Weldon — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 02:10:40 +0000

And this is the main reason I read sillyoldtwit.com. Stunning post.

By: Mary-js

Mary-js — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:46:47 +0000

��

By: Roberta

Roberta — Sun, 09 Nov 2008 17:58:04 +0000

Actually, I did write to Ian once, after I read his book, “The Gates Of Janus”. I have always found him a very intelligent and fascinating person. I was thrilled to receive a written response from him which was extremely polite and well written. I would like to see him write another book. I thoroughly enjoyed his analyses of other serial killers. I would like to see his treatise on the Bernardo-Homolka case as it closely parallels his own.

By: Ian Brady Moors Murder Yet Another Suicide Bid « Silly Old Twit

Ian Brady Moors Murder Yet Another Suicide Bid « Silly Old Twit — Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:35:19 +0000

[...] 12, 2008 Ian Brady , the moors murderer is reported to have been storing up pills with a view to killing himself. Suicide , we are told [...]

By: Ian Brady: Moors Murders and False Memories « Silly Old Twit

Ian Brady: Moors Murders and False Memories « Silly Old Twit — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:59:55 +0000

[...] Yesterday or the day before I posted a short piece about Ian Brady and the people who write to him in which I gave a link to someone who had had a letter from him. In the letter Brady speaks of [...]

By: sillyoldtwit

sillyoldtwit — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:42:44 +0000

Beyond what I said in Ian Brady:Comments and Discussion I’m not sure what else is left to say. Still, thank you for the comments.

By: Paula Badger

Paula Badger — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 08:59:24 +0000

Ian Brady writes to the media, and to those who sooth his ego as yes they write or listen to such identities.

Why I wrote to Ian Brady is to give him a chance to say he is not at Shiney Brook. He would abhorr the spelling mistake and Myra did not make such errors. So they were not mistakes but deliberate as he knows.

The bog at Saddleworth is like a churned up landfill as so many have dug for a weekends outing over 43years and pestered the police with visions and demands. Some as academically trained do try too and also fail to find the lad. Ian Brady the man who is said to have killed him, buried him and knows where he is contradicts Myra.

His letter above in ‘Gates of Janus’ show a man using the glossary as to how many big words he can get into a sentence instead of HIS own Scottish twang we know he uses. So the above does not apply to me. I want him to say before he looks a bigger arse than he is that he is where John is and in that vicinity.

The reason for that is the photo of the mini-pickup and his affectedness with filth as the quagmire on the three Grains is not condusive to his nature, or predelictions. There is no fine line showing Hoe Grain from the rest. Saving face is why I told his solicitor I wanted him to reply to Yorkshire police, any police or via his solicitor to me as I am the one digging and claiming to do so.

There are psychics, ex-cops and all manner who have dug and are digging who engage with me to join them. Being gifted myself I do not dismiss any one person, some are more sinister than others and engage in enticements to get you to join them which never come off. I have time for many gifted psychics and many ex-police officers. But Ian does not.

Ian Brady will receive any visitor that sooths his ego in the philosophy sciences as diatribe of his making. He will not see a practical scientist as he uses the ‘Countdown’ board to find as many words of longevity in a written sentence. For some reason it makes him feel superior. It is the opposite.

Jargon in the ‘epistemic community’ of which he is not a member is a sign of immaturity.

All science communication is at the level of a layman as addressing the reader with the definition, not the glossary term.

That is how he evades the question of his own insecurity and why he hides the fact he does not know where Keith is. One said of a femur damaged. I would ask Ian if that is valid or not in this victim unfound?