The book is not in fact a fine piece of writing as it is dictatorial and does not relay what is promises. It does not provide a framework of what killers think and do, it uses threatenening psychopathic tendancies that no person that is versed in psychological profiling could detect. I have many enemies that sell products to make them seem scientific yet they do not post here with such qualifications as like Ian they have legally obtained none. They are charlatons as Ian is.

Ian had the chance to tell in his book the method of his burials, the motive and how they differed from the men he wrote of as an ‘expert’. The title even is a ploy as his solicitor suggested

There is nothing special about these two. They are very ordinary people who chose to commit acts which made them feel better but had disastrous consequences for the children they acted out on.

No one is to blame other than Brady and Hinley. Sure others, ‘society’ if you will, may have hurt or degraded these selfish nasty but very ordinary people, but they chose to take that out on children.

We (meaning a community of humans) can’t murder murderers because that lowers us to their level so we must keep them locked up in as close to misery as we can make it for as long as we can keep them alive.

Those they killed had their one crack at life stolen from them and therefore our only way of ensuring that others realise what a terrible thing it is to take a life, by keeping murderers alive for as long as possible in total misery.

Who cares what Brady says about bodies or other deaths, listening to it gives power to a power hungry prick. Don’t listen.

Yes it is sad that rich crims rarely get punished but it is also sad that most victims of crims, whatever the wealth of the perpetrator may be, are poor so we must punish anyone who hurts others the way Brady did.

Letting him off because he’s poor makes the injustice against poor victims worse not better.